Showing posts with label mistakes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mistakes. Show all posts

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Spelling mistakes 'cost millions'

14 July 2011 Last updated at 01:09 GMT By Sean Coughlan BBC News education correspondent Online sales Customer spending on a website can be cut in half by a spelling mistake, says an online businessman An online entrepreneur says that poor spelling is costing the UK millions of pounds in lost revenue for internet businesses.

Charles Duncombe says an analysis of website figures shows a single spelling mistake can cut online sales in half.

Mr Duncombe says when recruiting staff he has been "shocked at the poor quality of written English".

Sales figures suggest misspellings put off consumers who could have concerns about a website's credibility, he says.

The concerns were echoed by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), whose head of education and skills warned that too many employers were having to invest in remedial literacy lessons for their staff.

Written word

Mr Duncombe, who runs travel, mobile phones and clothing websites, says that poor spelling is a serious problem for the online economy.

Charles Duncombe Charles Duncombe says poor spelling is costing the economy millions

"Often these cutting-edge companies depend upon old-fashioned skills," says Mr Duncombe.

And he says that the struggle to recruit enough staff who can spell means that this sector of the economy is not as efficient as it might be.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics published last month showed internet sales in the UK running at ?527m per week.

"I know that industry bemoaning the education system is nothing new but it is becoming more and more of a problem with more companies going online.

"This is because when you sell or communicate on the internet, 99% of the time it is done by the written word."

Mr Duncombe says that it is possible to identify the specific impact of a spelling mistake on sales.

He says he measured the revenue per visitor to the tightsplease.co.uk website and found that the revenue was twice as high after an error was corrected.

"If you project this across the whole of internet retail, then millions of pounds worth of business is probably being lost each week due to simple spelling mistakes," says Mr Duncombe, director of the Just Say Please group.

Spelling is important to the credibility of a website, he says. When there are underlying concerns about fraud and safety, then getting the basics right is essential.

Continue reading the main story
When a consumer might be wary of spam or phishing efforts, a misspelt word could be a killer issue”

End Quote William Dutton Oxford Internet Institute "You get about six seconds to capture the attention on a website."

When recruiting school and university leavers, Mr Duncombe says too many applications have contained spelling mistakes or poor grammar.

"Some people even used text speak in their cover letter," he says.

Even among those who appeared to be able to spell, he says that a written test, without access to a computer spellchecker, revealed further problems with spelling.

William Dutton, director of the Oxford Internet Institute at Oxford University, says that in some informal parts of the internet, such as Facebook, there is greater tolerance towards spelling and grammar.

"However, there are other aspects, such as a home page or commercial offering that are not among friends and which raise concerns over trust and credibility," said Professor Dutton.

"In these instances, when a consumer might be wary of spam or phishing efforts, a misspelt word could be a killer issue."

James Fothergill, the CBI's head of education and skills, said: "Our recent research shows that 42% of employers are not satisfied with the basic reading and writing skills of school and college leavers and almost half have had to invest in remedial training to get their staff's skills up to scratch.

"This situation is a real concern and the government must make the improvement of basic literacy and numeracy skills of all school and college leavers a top priority."


View the original article here

Sunday, June 19, 2011

'Funding mistakes' over academies

16 June 2011 Last updated at 17:21 GMT By Angela Harrison Education correspondent, BBC News primary pupils Michael Gove says the government inherited a very complicated system Some new academy schools in England have been given too much money by central government and face having it "clawed back".

Education Secretary Michael Gove says mistakes have been made by local authorities.

Hampshire Council says its academies have been given an extra ?300 per pupil even though it followed set procedures.

The government wants all state-funded schools to become academies, which are outside of council control.

Currently about one out of every six seconary schools in England is an academy.

They are meant to be funded on the same level as other state schools, but with the money coming directly from central government rather than via councils.

In addition, they are given an amount of money that would previously have been spent by their local council on their behalf to provide services such as those for children with special educational needs.

To determine the level of funding they receive, councils have to tell central government how much they spend per pupil on such services in their area.

It is in this reporting that the government says errors have been made, but councils dispute this.

'Flawed system'

Mr Gove told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "There have been individual mistakes made by local authorities in the calculation of their Section 251 returns."

Asked whether officials in the Department for Education had been responsible for any of the mistakes, he replied: "Not that I am aware of."

Mr Gove said the government had been working with a "flawed" system inherited from the previous Labour government.

"There is a problem with the financing of all schools because of the funding mechanism that was designed by the last government," he said.

Officials at the Department for Education said there had been a "small number of cases" where mistakes had been made by local authorities, which could have led to academies being over- or under-funded.

"We don't think this is a big problem for the vast number of authorities," a spokesman said.

Decisions on whether to "claw back" money that had been overpaid would take into account issues such as the scale of the error and the timing, he said.

Continue reading the main story
It raises a simple question: does the secretary of state have a grip on his budget? ”

End Quote Andy Burnham Shadow education secretary He said mistakes along these lines had happened in previous years.

"The government has said many times that the system is unfair and unclear, that is why we're proposing changes to the school funding formula," he added.

The chairman of the Local Government Association's children and young people board, Baroness Ritchie, said: "This has arisen because the government has misinterpreted council education expenditure returns for purposes for which they were not intended in the way that it calculates the top-up grant for academies.

"We have made it clear that school choice is something that councils support, but whatever you think of academies, they should be funded on the same basis as other schools."

'Double-counting'

Hampshire County Council says it did what it was expected to - but has now found that its secondary school academies have been allocated an extra ?300 per pupil.

That can amount to as much as ?300,000 for a big secondary academy.

Councillor Roy Perry, Hampshire County Council's deputy leader and executive lead member for children's services, said: "Hampshire County Council has followed standard accounting and reporting procedures."

In a statement, he said the process used by the government "effectively double-counted and inflated the calculation for Hampshire secondary academies by some ?300 per pupil per year".

"Once this issue was identified we took steps to advise schools and also raised this as an issue with the DfE. We are committed to working closely with the Department for Education and the Hampshire family of schools in the best interests of Hampshire."

News of the problems emerged as Mr Gove announced 200 under-performing primary schools would be closed next year and converted to academies, under the wing of top schools.

Labour then tabled an emergency question in the House of Commons on the issue of the mistakes and academy funding.

Its education spokesman, Andy Burnham, said: "It raises a simple question: does the secretary of state have a grip on his budget?

"On the day that serious questions are being asked about whether he has a properly funded plan to back up the rapid expansion of his academy programme, only this secretary of state could be in Birmingham announcing a further major expansion of it."

Mr Burnham added: "Will the minister tell the House how many schools have been over-funded and what is the total amount is that has been paid in error?"

Schools minister Nick Gibb told MPs the government was taking action to sort out problems left by Labour.

At the weekend it emerged that the government was going to "reconsider" an element of its local education funding relating to academies, following a legal challenge by 26 councils.

The councils have begun a judicial review of the decision to deduct ?148m from their education budgets.


View the original article here